If managers are unable to commit to a 3-day event, J-SAT can provide a 1-day
overview compressed into a balanced amount of didactic presentation and
experiential how-to.
Once you contact us to discuss the specifics of the training and set dates, our
training coordinator will walk you through the entire process, making sure that
you have all the information you need to provide for a smooth, effective
training experience.
Evidence-based Practice for Community Corrections
Evidenced-Based Practices (EBP) is the progressive organizational use of direct,
scientific, current evidence to guide efficient, cost-effective correctional
services that positively impact subsequent recidivism / victimization and/or
public satisfaction.
In response to the belief popular in the ‘70s and ‘80s that “nothing works” in
reducing crime rates, researchers in the ‘90’s increasingly focused on
discovering which line officer and administrator approaches, case planning
procedures, treatment strategies, and quality assurance measures did
consistently reduce recidivism. Findings revealed that supervision strategies
that emphasize treatment, particularly cognitive-behavioral interventions
targeted to higher risk offenders, reliably reduce recidivism.
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) interventions have proven to be effective
with a wide variety of offender and general populations. These interventions
include:
- Cognitive skill-building curriculum-driven courses
- Motivational Interviewing or enhancement
- Relapse prevention training
- Family-based home interventions like Multi-Systemic Therapy (MST) and Family
Functional Therapy (FFT)
- Contingency management strategies that emphasize positive rewards.
Our EBP Strategy
Through many state implementations of various offender assessment tools, we have
combined these treatment principles with other findings regarding offender
assessment and ongoing quality assurance into a comprehensive strategy broken
down into 8 steps. This combination ensures that EBP:
- Relies upon statistically-sound risk / needs assessment to match offenders to
the appropriate level of supervision and treatment)
- Encourages collaborative officer-offender discussions using Motivational
Interviewing to identify and enhance intrinsic offender motivation to make
positive changes
- Assigns offenders to specific treatment based on their “riskiest” pro-criminal
factors
- Ensures that assigned treatment includes direct practice in thinking and
behavioral skills that have been shown to reduce recidivism significantly
- Mandates that those interacting with offenders use positive reinforcement in
response to offenders’ pro-social behavior change milestones
- Provides healthy community support structures and contacts for offenders that
can persist after offenders have terminated out of probation or other sanctions
- Requires ongoing measurement of system components that must maintain quality to
maintain positive effects on offender outcomes
- and Ensures ongoing feedback on all these components to help an organization
evolve in its proficiency for successfully implementing EBP
While adopting any one of these principles can produce some positive recidivism
reductions, system-wide adoption of the entire EBP strategy is necessary for
obtaining results consistent with research. we are renowned for helping
correctional organizations successfully implement an EBP approach through:
- Assessing how an organization’s current practice compares to EBP
- Helping staff to understand the impacts of EBP on the organization
- Developing a customized implementation plan
- Providing training on EBP fundamentals, EBP for Community Corrections, and
Training for Trainers
- Providing EBP research reviews, performance measurements, assessments, and
database tutorials.
Even when not conducting a full system implementation of EBP, we use the EBP
principles of research data analysis in developing all of our tools and
services. Our continually-updated database system includes the analysis of data
in the areas of Motivational Interviewing skills, group process, offender risk
assessment, and officer/offender interaction critiques.